Is the Dalai Lama Scared of zionist power?

The Dalai Lama, who received a Nobel Peace Prize in 1994, has recently sparked some controversy by positing that the refugees in Europe don’t really belong there. “Receive them, help them, educate them … but ultimately they should develop their own country,” Dalai Lama said. “Europe belongs to Europeans,” he added

By helping the refugees, Dalai Lama continued, Europe was “morally responsible” for the crisis itself. That all sounds good, but there is one problem: The Dalai Lama failed to address the central issues that sparked the refugee crisis in the first place. It is one thing to say that the refugees must return, but it is another thing to tell the world the causes of the problem and how it spread.

This is the freedom that the Khazarian gangsters have brought to Iraq and much of the world; this is the sort of heaven these intellectual and political geniuses are seeking in the Middle East and elsewhere. And the ideological agenda of the neoconservative movement progressively attacks Christian families and neighborhoods in the Middle East.

By the end of November 2012, the Syrian war had caused at least 40,000 people to leave their homeland, and “1.2 million have been driven from their homes within the country, according to the United Nations refugee agency. Some 2.5 million people need humanitarian assistance, and the number keeps climbing.”

Now my questions for the Dalai Lama are very simple. Why didn’t he address the central issues? Why did he find it politically convenient to talk about the refugee crisis and not its causes and origins?

Doesn’t the Dalai Lama know that Europe is largely dysfunctional at the present moment because European leaders are allowing the Israeli regime to dominate foreign policy in the Middle East? Where were the nationalist groups in Europe when Bush was bombing civilian houses in Iraq? Why are they rising now? Don’t they know that the refugee crisis is partly a response to perpetual wars?

Doesn’t the Dalai Lama know that Europe is largely dysfunctional at the present moment because European leaders are allowing the Israeli regime to dominate foreign policy in the Middle East? Where were the nationalist groups in Europe when Bush was bombing civilian houses in Iraq? Why are they rising now? Don’t they know that the refugee crisis is partly a response to perpetual wars?

You see, the Dalai Lama cannot address these issues without squaring off with the Khazarian Bankster Cult, a diabolical group which has no regard for the moral and political order. Surely the Dalai Lama has heard of the remark of Prime Minister Mahatir of Malaysia, who said that the Khazarian Mafia “rule by proxy.” They “have now gained control of the most powerful countries and they, the tiny community, have become a world power.”

“I am glad to be labeled anti-Semitic […] How can I be otherwise, when the Zionist Jews who so often talk of the horrors they suffered during the Holocaust show the same Nazi cruelty and hard-heartedness towards not just their enemies but even towards their allies should any try to stop the senseless killing of their Palestinian enemies.”

Daila Lama did get into trouble a few years ago by saying that

“I’ve been to Israel a few times. On hearing the Jewish viewpoint, it still looks sort of sub-reasons from thousands of years old they have certain rights in their place. They themselves in ancient times they became refugees thousands of years ago in different countries.

“Then on the same occasion, I met some groups of Palestinians and I heard their sort of complaint and they also want rights that the place belongs to them, so it is difficult to judge. The best way is, no matter who they are they should live together and help each other. I’m very much impressed that in Jerusalem where the Jewish community there, their land is much greener and they use every technique, water, trees and grass is much greener. Whereas on the Palestinian side it still remains dry like the desert.”

Perhaps Dalai Lama is scared to stir the political pot again. But he has to address the main issues in order for us to take him seriously. Until then, he needs to shut up.

Jonas E. Alexis